a |
achievements | Industrial Use of ACL2: Applications, Achievements, Challenges, and Directions |
ACL2 | Industrial Use of ACL2: Applications, Achievements, Challenges, and Directions |
Answer Set Programming | A Case for Query-driven Predicate Answer Set Programming |
Applications | 24 Challenges in Deductive Software Verification |
Artificial Intelligence | AI at CADE/IJCAR |
automated reasoning | SC-square: when Satisfiability Checking and Symbolic Computation join forces AI at CADE/IJCAR The Potential of Interference-Based Proof Systems |
automated theorem proving | We know (nearly) nothing!l But can we learn? |
automatic theorem provers | Towards Strong Higher-Order Automation for Fast Interactive Verification |
b |
Big Data | Automated Reasoning for Explainable Artificial Intelligence |
c |
CADE | AI at CADE/IJCAR |
calculi | The Potential of Interference-Based Proof Systems |
certification | Beyond DRAT: Challenges in Certifying UNSAT |
Challenges | 24 Challenges in Deductive Software Verification |
combinations | Making Automatic Theorem Provers more Versatile |
computer algebra | SC-square: when Satisfiability Checking and Symbolic Computation join forces |
Conflict-driven reasoning | Automated Reasoning for Explainable Artificial Intelligence |
d |
deduction | We know (nearly) nothing!l But can we learn? |
deduction modulo | Making Automatic Theorem Provers more Versatile |
deductive software verification | 24 Challenges in Deductive Software Verification |
DRAT | Beyond DRAT: Challenges in Certifying UNSAT |
e |
explanation | Automated Reasoning for Explainable Artificial Intelligence |
f |
first-order | Making Automatic Theorem Provers more Versatile Do Portfolio Solvers Harm? |
first-order logic | The Potential of Interference-Based Proof Systems Checkable Proofs for First-Order Theorem Proving |
formalization | Beyond DRAT: Challenges in Certifying UNSAT |
h |
Heuristics | We know (nearly) nothing!l But can we learn? |
higher-order | Making Automatic Theorem Provers more Versatile |
higher-order logic | Towards Strong Higher-Order Automation for Fast Interactive Verification |
i |
IJCAR | AI at CADE/IJCAR |
industrial applications | Industrial Use of ACL2: Applications, Achievements, Challenges, and Directions |
interactive theorem proving | Industrial Use of ACL2: Applications, Achievements, Challenges, and Directions |
m |
machine learning | We know (nearly) nothing!l But can we learn? |
p |
portfolio | Do Portfolio Solvers Harm? |
predicate ASP | A Case for Query-driven Predicate Answer Set Programming |
proof checking | Checkable Proofs for First-Order Theorem Proving |
proofs | The Potential of Interference-Based Proof Systems |
q |
QBF | The Potential of Interference-Based Proof Systems |
Quantifier Instantiation | Challenges for Fast Synthesis Procedures in SMT |
s |
SAT | Beyond DRAT: Challenges in Certifying UNSAT Do Portfolio Solvers Harm? |
satisfiability | The Potential of Interference-Based Proof Systems |
satisfiability checking | SC-square: when Satisfiability Checking and Symbolic Computation join forces |
Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) | Towards Strong Higher-Order Automation for Fast Interactive Verification |
search | We know (nearly) nothing!l But can we learn? |
SMT | Making Automatic Theorem Provers more Versatile Challenges for Fast Synthesis Procedures in SMT |
solver | Do Portfolio Solvers Harm? |
superposition calculus | Towards Strong Higher-Order Automation for Fast Interactive Verification |
symbolic computation | SC-square: when Satisfiability Checking and Symbolic Computation join forces |
symmetry breaking | Beyond DRAT: Challenges in Certifying UNSAT |
synthesis | Challenges for Fast Synthesis Procedures in SMT |
t |
theorem prover | Do Portfolio Solvers Harm? |
theorem proving | Checkable Proofs for First-Order Theorem Proving |
theories | Making Automatic Theorem Provers more Versatile |
u |
usable automated reasoning | A Case for Query-driven Predicate Answer Set Programming |